Compare Toyota Supra 5 vs BMW i8
Variants
2.0 197
2.0 258
3.0 340
374PS
374PS Euro6d
362PS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
290 L / 10.2 cu-ft
154 L / 5.4 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
30.0 L / 7.9 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
315 kg / 694 lbs
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/35 ZR19 (front) / 275/35 ZR19 (rear)
Front wheel tires: 195/50 R20 Rear wheel tires: 215/45 R20
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
355.0 V
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door plug-in hybrid Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
117 mm / 4.6 in
Size | Height
1292 mm
Size | Length
4379 mm
4689 mm / 184.6 in
Size | Width
1854 mm
1942 mm / 76.5 in | 2218 mm / 87.3 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1644.0 mm / 64.7 in
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 7J x 20 Rear wheel rims: 7.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2470 mm / 97.2 in
2800 mm / 110.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.4 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.2 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph, 120.0 km/h / 74.6 mph (EV mode)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine
B38K15T0
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.5 cu-in / 1499.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
154.1 hp/L / 2.5 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
94.6 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
320 Nm / 236.0 lb-ft @ 3700 rpm + 250 Nm / 184.4 lb-ft
Engine | Type
BMW B58B30 turbo I6 or BMW B48B20 turbo I4
Twin-scroll turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-3 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Fuel Capacity
52 L
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Debut
2019 NAIAS
Made In
Austria
Reviews
Neofiliac score
88%
54%
Pros
- Punchy six-cylinder engine
- Fantastic rear-wheel drive chassis
- Superb styling
- Great performance
- Supercar-like styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Tight interior
- Only available with tiny engines
- Very little cargo space
- Gigantic reliability concern
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.