Compare Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible vs Toyota Camry Solara Convertible
Variants
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
2.2
3.0 198
3.0 200
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
249 L / 8.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1400 mm / 55.1 in
Size | Width
1806 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2811 mm / 110.7 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
54%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Affordable way to get a big V8
- Sounds great
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Good interior and exterior finish
Cons
- Build quality concerns
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Lethargic handling
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.