Compare Chevrolet Camaro 6 vs Ford Mustang 5
Variants
2.0
2.0 T MT
2.0 T
3.6 Euro6d MT
3.6 MT
3.6 Euro6d
3.6
6.2 MT
6.2
ZL1 MT
ZL1
ZL1 Euro6d MT
ZL1 Euro6d
3.7
3.7 AT
4.0
4.0 AT
GT 4.6
GT 4.6 AT
Shelby GT500 5.4 540
Shelby GT500 5.4 500
Shelby GT500 5.8
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.35
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 b
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
75%
Pros
- Superb OVH V8s
- Athletic styling
- Superb exterior styling
- Great V8 choices
- Manual widely available
- Front-engine, RWD
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Low build quality
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.