Compare BMW X2 F39 vs Renault Captur 2
Variants
sDrive18d
sDrive18d AT
xDrive18d
xDrive18d AT
sDrive18i
sDrive18i AT
sDrive20d AT
xDrive20d AT
sDrive20i AT
sDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive20i AT
xDrive20i Euro6d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25d AT
xDrive25e AT
M35i AT
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 91
1.3 TCe 130 DCT
1.3 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 154 AT
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
E-TECH 143
E-TECH 160
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Construction
Battery | Capacity
10.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
295.0 V
Dimensions
Size | Length
4360 mm / 171.7 in
4227 mm / 166.4 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2639 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Electric Range
57.0 km / 35.4 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
34%
3%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Ugly styling
- Crossover nonsense
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- Poor build quality
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.