Compare Volvo XC40 vs Jeep Renegade facelift
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.3 T-GDI 180 4x4 AT
1.3 Turbo 150 DCT
1.3 Turbo 190 4xe AT
1.3 Turbo 240 4xe AT
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 120 DCT
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4 AT
2.0 Multijet 170 4x4 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 182 4x4 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 182 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.4 L / 6.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Passengers
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson strut
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
400 mm / 15.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.4 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Powertrain
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
11%
Pros
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Short full-electric range
- Stuck with MacPherson struts at all four corners
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.