Compare Volvo XC40 vs Opel Grandland X
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 130 AT
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d AT
1.5d 130
1.5d 130 AT
1.6 Turbo 180 AT
1.6 Turbo 224 PHEV
1.6 Turbo 300 PHEV AWD
1.6d 120
1.6d 120 AT
2.0d 177 AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
14.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.2 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross) | 11.5 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
188 mm / 7.4 in
Size | Height
1609 mm / 63.3 in
Size | Length
4477 mm / 176.3 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheelbase
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
18%
Pros
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.