Compare Toyota Tundra 3 vs Ford Ranger
Variants
CrewMax Short Bed 3.5
CrewMax Short Bed 3.5 4x4
CrewMax Short Bed 3.5 Hybrid
CrewMax Short Bed 3.5 Hybrid 4x4
CrewMax Short Bed TRD Pro Hybrid 4x4
CrewMax Standard Bed 3.5
CrewMax Standard Bed 3.5 4x4
CrewMax Standard Bed 3.5 Hybrid
CrewMax Standard Bed 3.5 Hybrid 4x4
Double Cab Long Bed 3.5 348
Double Cab Long Bed 3.5 389
Double Cab Long Bed 3.5 389 4x4
Double Cab Standard Bed 3.5 348
Double Cab Standard Bed 3.5 389
Double Cab Standard Bed 3.5 389 4x4
Double Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Double Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Double Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 AT
Double Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 AT
Double Cab 3.2 Duratorq 4x4
Double Cab 3.2 Duratorq 4x4 AT
Double Cab Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 AT
Regular Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Regular Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Super Cab 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
12.4 L / 13.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.3 L / 7.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 353 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 345 mm
Offroad | Climb Angle
35.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Multi-link
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.9 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Size | Height
1981 mm / 78.0 in
Wheelbase
3220 mm / 126.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
LEV-III
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine
V35A-FTS
Engine | Bore
85.5 mm / 3.4 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.4:1
16.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.4 L / 210.2 cu-in / 3445.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct- and multi-port-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
10-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Automatic
Production
Availability
2021
2019
Debut
2018 Detroit Auto Show
Made In
USA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
39%
Pros
- Great styling
- Good build quality
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Good offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Horrible turning circle
- Poor performance
- Underpowered
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.