Compare Renault Clio V vs Renault Megane III
Variants
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1162 L / 41.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
4295 mm / 169.1 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2583 mm / 101.7 in
2641 mm / 104.0 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
19%
20%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent engine reliability
Cons
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.