HatchbackRenault20% by Neofiliac Team88% by External Reviewers

Renault Megane III

Compact Hatchback

Product Gallery

Photo 0of Renault Megane IIIPhoto 1of Renault Megane IIIPhoto 2of Renault Megane IIIPhoto 3of Renault Megane IIIPhoto 4of Renault Megane IIIPhoto 5of Renault Megane III

Product Overview

Renault Megane III is an affordable compact hatchback in production from 2008 to 2015. It was available with a range of inline-4 engines that displaced 1.2 to 2.0 liters.
Compared to the Mk2 Megane, the Megane III has a more conventional styling but is not really good-looking at all. It is essentially a larger Clio in design. Renault started using CVTs, which isn't conducive to good driving characteristics or long-term reliability.
Still, the Megane doesn't use independent rear suspensions.

Ratings

What we found

Neofiliac score 20%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes

What external reviewers found

External score 88%
Pros
  • Superb on-road performance
  • Impressive handling
  • Gorgeous interior
  • Powerful engine
  • Lots of fun to drive
Cons
  • Cup suspension isn't as good as standard
  • Rear visibility could be better
  • No air-conditioning
  • No lap time

Your rating:

12345678910
?/10

Price Comparison

As associates of the merchants above, we earn a commission when you make a purchase using the supplied links.

Specifications

Variants shown:
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220

Related Products

Renault Megane 3 Coupe
  • Interesting Megane RS
· 37%
Toyota Auris 2 (E180)
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
· 27%
Seat Leon 3 (5F)
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Looks fine from some angles
· 24%
Opel Astra K / Vauxhall Astra / Holden Astra (B16)
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
· 24%
Citroen C4
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent engine reliability
· 16%
Renault Megane II
  • Interesting engine options
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
· 16%
Chevrolet Cruze 2 (D2LC)
  • Slightly improved styling
  • Good fuel economy ratings
· 20%
Chrysler PT Cruiser
  • So ugly that it's an icon
· 2%
Opel Astra H / Chevrolet Astra / Holden Astra / Vauxhall Astra (A04)
  • Decent engine options
  • Decent exterior styling
· 17%
Kia Forte / K3 II (YD)
  • More spacious than Cee'd
  • Clean design
· 14%
Citroen C4 Coupe
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 13%
Dodge Caliber
  • Unique design (though not pretty)
  • SRT-4
· 27%

External Reviews

carmagazine[1]

Reviewer score 83% (normalized by Neofiliac)
Reviewers from carmagazine have found:
Renault's new Megane RS 265 Trophy recently smashed the Nurburgring lap record for front-wheel drive cars. Unlike previous Trophy-badged Renaults, the 265 doesn't have any trick suspension components over and above the standard Cup-chassis'd, LSD-equipped car. The 265 is brilliant to drive, but £1200 for some different rubber and an ECU remap isn't spectacular value.
Pros
  • Superb on-road performance
  • Lots of fun to drive
Cons
  • Cup suspension isn't as good as standard
  • Rear visibility could be better

References

  1. ^ Renaultsport Megane 265 Trophy (2011) review. [carmagazine].

<

>

x