Compare Renault Clio V vs Renault Twingo II
Variants
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
4
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Wheelbase
2583 mm / 101.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Reviews
Neofiliac score
19%
14%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Small turning circle
- Stylish design
Cons
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.