Compare Mazda6 III facelift 2 vs Mazda 6 GJ facelift
Variants
2.0 145
2.0 165
2.0 165 AT
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 184
2.2D 184 AT
2.5 187
2.5 187 AT
2.5 194 AT
2.5 227 AT
2.5 250 AT
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4870 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1840 mm / 72.4 in
Wheelbase
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2018
2015 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
27%
Pros
- Good exterior styling
- Good engine reliability
- Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Bland styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- GPF ruins many good petrol engines
- Stuck with MacPherson strut
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.