Compare Mercedes C-Class Coupe C205 facelift vs Mercedes CLK C209 facelift
Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.6 ft
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Length
4652 mm / 183.1 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in | 1991 mm / 78.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.28
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Reviews
Neofiliac score
70%
79%
Pros
- Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Robust drivetrain
Cons
- AWD nonsense
- Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
- Less durable engines
- Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.