Compare Mercedes CLK C209 vs Ford Mustang 5
Variants
CLK 200 CGI
CLK 200 CGI AT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 200 Kompressor AT
CLK 240
CLK 240 AT
CLK 270 CDI
CLK 270 CDI AT
CLK 320 AT
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
CLK 55 AMG
3.7
3.7 AT
4.0
4.0 AT
GT 4.6
GT 4.6 AT
Shelby GT500 5.4 540
Shelby GT500 5.4 500
Shelby GT500 5.8
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid axle
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.35
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
72%
75%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Decent styling
- Robust engine lineup
- Superb exterior styling
- Great V8 choices
- Manual widely available
- Front-engine, RWD
Cons
- CLK 55 AMG is not supercharged
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.