Compare Nissan 350Z vs Peugeot 407 Coupe
Variants
283
300 AT
313
313 AT
300
2.2
2.7 HDi
3.0
3.0 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
235 L / 8.3 cu-ft
400 L / 14.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.9 L / 8.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
67.0 L / 17.7 gal
Passengers
2
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1399 mm / 55.1 in
Size | Length
4815 mm / 189.6 in
Size | Width
1868 mm / 73.5 in
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
65%
34%
Pros
- Good drivetrain setup
- Good handling characteristics
- Elegant styling
- Better interior than the 407 sedan
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor interior finish
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front and semi-independent suspensions in the rear
- Questionable reliability
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.