Compare Toyota Harrier 3 vs Toyota Highlander 2
Variants
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
2.7 AT
3.3 Hybrid AWD
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
292 L / 10.3 cu-ft ~ 2282 L / 80.6 cu-ft
Passengers
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
206 mm / 8.1 in
Size | Height
1690 mm / 66.5 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Size | Length
4785 mm / 188.4 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in
1910 mm / 75.2 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2790 mm / 109.8 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
63%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good build quality
- Improved styling
- Sufficiently powerful engines
- High cargo capacity
- Superb reliability record
Cons
- Small engines
- Slow and sluggish
- Slow and sluggish
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.