Compare Toyota C-HR vs Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 298 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 281 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
38.0 deg
26.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/50 R18
215/60 R17 96H, 225/50 R18 95H
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Dimensions
Size | Height
1565 mm / 61.6 in
Size | Length
4390 mm / 172.8 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Wheel Size
18 in
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
42%
Pros
- Decent exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
- Small turning circle
- Good engine reliability
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Just a clumsy hatchback
- Poor performance
- Only available with small engines
- Impractical
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.