Compare Hyundai Kona vs Citroen C4 III
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 HDi 110
1.5 HDi 130 AT
e-C4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Size | Width
1800 mm / 70.9 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1834 mm / 72.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Powertrain
Engine
Kappa
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
15%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
- Horrible performance
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.