Compare Renault Twingo III vs Renault Clio V
Variants
0.9 TCe
1.0 SCe
GT 0.9 TCe
GT 0.9 TCe AT
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
188 L / 6.6 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, De Dion
Semi-independent
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
153 mm / 6.0 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
3595 mm / 141.5 in
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2583 mm / 101.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Stroke
73.1 mm / 2.9 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
19%
Pros
- Interesting RWD setup
- Low fuel consumption
- Stylish design
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.