Compare Mercedes A-Class W169 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift
Variants
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft ~ 1995 L / 70.5 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
3838 mm / 151.1 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1764 mm / 69.4 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2568 mm / 101.1 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
1%
23%
Pros
- Three-pointed star
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Poor engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- CVT
- Exceptionally ugly
- Great insult to the Mercedes name
- No powerful engine options
- Tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- More emission control systems to fail
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.