Compare Honda CR-V 3 vs Honda CR-V 5
Variants
2.0 VTEC
2.0 VTEC Euro5
2.0 VTEC AT
2.0 VTEC Euro5 AT
2.2 CDTi
2.2 DTEC
2.2 DTEC AT
2.4 VTEC AT
1.5 173
1.5 173 AWD
1.5 190 AWD CVT
1.5 190 CVT
1.5 193 AWD CVT
1.6d 120 AT
1.6d 120 AWD AT
1.6d 160 AWD
1.6d 160 AWD AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid AWD
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD
2.4 AWD CVT
2.4 CVT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2620 mm / 103.1 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
33%
41%
Pros
- Improved styling
- Great engine reliability
- Good manual transmission
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good engine reliability
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible CVT
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.