Compare Volvo V50 vs Volvo XC70 II
Variants
1.6D
1.6
1.8
2.0D
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5
T5 AT
2.4D
2.4T
2.4T AT
2.5T
2.5T AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
417 L / 14.7 cu-ft ~ 1307 L / 46.2 cu-ft
485 L / 17.1 cu-ft ~ 1641 L / 58.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15
215/65 R16
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1452 mm / 57.2 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4514 mm / 177.7 in
4733 mm / 186.3 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
1548.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheel Size
15 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2763 mm / 108.8 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
21%
Pros
- Clean and simple design
- Rather reliable drivetrain
- Manual transmission widely available
- Wonderful T5 engine
- Good I5 engine lineup
- AWD standard
Cons
- Not very powerful
- Stuck with MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Lots of ugly black plastic
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.