Compare Alfa Romeo 166 vs Alfa Romeo 166 facelift
Variants
2.0 TS 150PS
2.0 TS 155PS
2.0 V6 205PS
2.4 JTD 136PS
2.4 JTD 140PS
2.4 JTD 150PS
2.5 V6 188PS
2.5 V6 190PS
2.5 V6 190PS AT
3.0 V6 220PS
3.0 V6 220PS AT
3.0 V6 226PS
3.0 V6 226PS AT
2.0 TS
2.4 JTD 10V
2.4 JTD 20V
2.4 JTD 20V AT
2.5 V6
3.0 V6 AT
3.2 V6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
490 L / 17.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
510 kg / 1124 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1416 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
4720 mm / 185.8 in
4720 mm / 185.8 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1800 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
43%
Pros
- Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
- Rather good-looking (though worse than 156)
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Improved exterior design
- Improved engine lineup
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Less well appointed than many competitors
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.