Compare Mercedes S-class W220 facelift vs Mercedes CLS C219
Variants
S 320 CDI
S 350
S 350 4MATIC
S 350 4MATIC
S 350 L
S 400 CDI
S 400 CDI L
S 430
S 430 4MATIC
S 430 4MATIC L
S 430 7AT
S 430 L
S 430 L 7AT
S 500
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 7AT
S 500 L
S 500 L 7AT
S 55 AMG
S 55 AMG L
S 600 L
S 65 AMG
CLS 320 CDI
CLS 350
CLS 500 M113
CLS 500 M273 / CLS 550
CLS 55 AMG
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
4
Payload
540 kg / 1190 lbs
Chassis
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Coupe
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2854 mm / 112.4 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Reviews
Neofiliac score
94%
85%
Pros
- Awe-inspiring 612hp + 1000Nm in the S65 AMG
- Overall robust and powerful drivetrains
- Further improved exterior styling
- Superb suspension setup
- The best design of all hunchback sedans
- Solid drivetrain
- Exceptional CLS 55 AMG
- Good interior quality
- No AWD nonsense
Cons
- Horrendous ABC reliability in higher-end models
- 4MATIC started to appear
- Started the 4-door coupe nonsense
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.