Compare Kia Forte 3 vs SEAT Toledo 4
Variants
1.4 T-GDI DCT
1.5 CVT
1.6 CVT
1.6 GDI DCT
1.6 PHEV
2.0
2.0 CVT
GT 1.6 T-GDI
GT 1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.2
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 TDI
1.4 TDI DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
12.9 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Size | Height
1461 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4482 mm / 176.5 in
Size | Width
1706 mm / 67.2 in
Track Width | Front
1463.0 mm / 57.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2602 mm / 102.4 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
China VI
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Stroke
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
40%
13%
Pros
- Good on fuel economy
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Improved DSG transmission
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- Stuck with semi-independent suspensions in the rear
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.