Compare Mazda 3 BL Sedan facelift vs Mazda6 III facelift 2
Variants
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
2.0 145
2.0 165
2.0 165 AT
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 184
2.2D 184 AT
2.5 187
2.5 187 AT
2.5 194 AT
2.5 227 AT
2.5 250 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
L5-VE
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2013
2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
53%
Pros
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
- Good exterior styling
- Good engine reliability
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Hatchback version fits the car better
- Bland styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.