Compare Mazda 3 BL Sedan vs Mazda 3 BL Sedan facelift
Variants
1.6D 5MT
1.6D 6MT
1.6
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 185PS
2.5
2.5 AT
1.6D
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.5
2.5 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
L5-VE
L5-VE
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
42%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Not as smart looking as the hatchback
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Hatchback version fits the car better
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.