Compare Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S40 II
Variants
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.0 TDI
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.5T AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
404 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 883 L / 31.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson
Transverse stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring multi-link with stabilizer
Transverse stabilizer
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
33%
Pros
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
- Quite reliable
- Available with the famous Volvo T5
- Interesting Inline-5 engines, including the T5
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Questionable exterior design
- Simple interiors
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.