Compare Jeep Compass 2 vs Jeep Compass
Variants
1.3 130
1.3 150 DCT
1.3 190 4xe AT
1.3 240 4xe AT
1.4 MultiAir 140
1.4 MultiAir 170 4x4 AT
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 130
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4 AT
2.0 Multijet 170 4x4 AT
2.0
2.0 CRD 4x4
2.2 CRD 136
2.2 CRD 163 4x4
2.4 4x4
2.4 4x4 CVT
2.4 Euro5 4x4
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
540 kg / 1190 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
32.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.3 ft
Water Fording
406 mm / 16.0 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
205 mm / 8.1 in
Track Width | Front
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2636 mm / 103.8 in
2635 mm / 103.7 in
Powertrain
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2017
Debut
2016 LA International Auto Show
Made In
Mexico, Brazil, China, India, Italy
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
33%
Pros
- Marginal offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Some offroad capabilities
Cons
- Ugly
- Crossover nonsense
- Only available with tiny engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Rather bland styling
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.