Compare Audi A3 8Y vs Lexus CT 200h facelift

Variants
30 g-tron DCT
30 TDI
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TFSI e DCT
45 TFSI e DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
424 kg / 935 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
215/45 R17
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1455 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4343 mm / 171.0 in
4351 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1816 mm / 71.5 in | 1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1420.0 kg / 3130.6 lbs
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2601 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.8 sec
CO2 Emission
101 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Fuel Economy
4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (combined) | 4.7 L/100km / 50.0 MPG (urban) | 4.1 L/100km / 57.4 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
98.0 hp / 73.1 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
54.5 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.4 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
142 Nm / 104.7 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
e-CVT

Production

Availability
2020
2017
Debut
2020-03

Reviews

Neofiliac score
41%
27%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Athletic styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good reliability
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible to drive

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.