Compare Volvo XC40 vs Audi Q3 F3
Variants
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
Capacity
Passengers
5
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
Performance
Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
37%
Pros
- Up to 414km electric range
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.