Compare Fiat 500 facelift vs Toyota Auris
Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
1.3
1.33
1.4 D-4D 90
1.4 D-4D Euro5
1.4
1.6 132 Euro5
1.6 132
1.6 124 AT
1.6 124
1.8
1.8 Euro5
Hybrid
2.0 D-4D 126 Euro5
2.0 D-4D 126
2.0 D-4D 90
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-CAT Euro5
Capacity
Passengers
4
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.362
Electric Range
1.5 km / 0.9 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
33%
Pros
- Great styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Rather good exterior design
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Poor suspension setup
- Bad 0-100kph time
- V6 only available in Japan
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.