Compare Kia Ceed 3 facelift vs Ford Focus 4 facelift
Variants
1.0 T-GDI 100
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.5 T-GDI 160
1.5 T-GDI 160 DCT
1.6 CRDI 136
1.6 CRDI 136 DCT
GT 1.6 T-GDI 204 DCT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 155 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 284x10 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Dimensions
Size | Width
1800 mm / 70.9 in | 2055 mm / 80.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Production
Availability
2021
2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
34%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- More reliable than its Euro competition
- Good handling
- Decent build quality
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Generic styling
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.