Compare Kia Soul 3 vs Hyundai Kona
Variants
1.6 GDI DCT
2.0 MPI
2.0 MPI CVT
e-Soul 39.2 kWh
e-Soul 67 kWh
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
16.2 deg
15.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
42.0 m / 137.8 ft
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Kappa
Reviews
Neofiliac score
17%
21%
Pros
- Cheap to purchase
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Poor handling
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.