Compare Nissan Altima 9 vs Nissan Cedric Y34
Variants
2.0T
2.5 AWD
2.5
2.5
2.5T 250hp AWD
2.5T 260hp AWD
3.0 240hp
3.0 280hp
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
436 L / 15.4 cu-ft
465 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 215/55 R17, 235/40 R19
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4900 mm / 192.9 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2824 mm / 111.2 in
2800 mm / 110.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
0.32
Powertrain
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
24%
43%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Sweet RB25DET turbo I6 engine
- FR layout
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Not the highest grade of build
- CVT
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Taxi connotations
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.