Compare Infiniti Q50 facelift vs Infiniti Q50
Variants
2.0t AT
2.2d
2.2d AT
3.0t 300 AWD AT
3.0t 400 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD AT
S 3.0t AT
2.0t
3.7
3.7 AWD
Hybrid
Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6 b
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
74%
Pros
- Great suspension setup
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Above average styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Beautiful styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Little improvement over pre-facelift
- Hybrid nonsense
- Addicted to Hybrid
- Started engine downsizing
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.