Compare Infiniti Q50 facelift vs Infiniti Q70
Variants
2.0t AT
2.2d
2.2d AT
3.0t 300 AWD AT
3.0t 400 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD AT
S 3.0t AT
M30d
M35h
M37
M37x
M56
M56x
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
346.0 V
Dimensions
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2900 mm / 114.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
6.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.6 sec
Top Speed
249.0 km/h / 154.7 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
87%
Pros
- Great suspension setup
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Above average styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Powerful and reliable NA V6 and V8 engines
- Fantastic styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- RWD as standard (though lots of AWD nonsense was sold)
Cons
- Little improvement over pre-facelift
- Hybrid nonsense
- Getting dirty with diesel and hybrid
- Series discontinued
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.