Compare Mercedes SLR McLaren Roadster vs Jaguar XK X150 Convertible facelift

Variants
Roadster
Roadster 722 S
XK
XKR
XKR-S

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
204 L / 7.2 cu-ft
200 L / 7.1 cu-ft ~ 313 L / 11.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
7.2 L / 7.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
97.0 L / 25.6 gal
70.6 L / 18.7 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
230 kg / 507 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 390 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
8.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
100 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Height
1281 mm / 50.4 in
Size | Length
4656 mm / 183.3 in
Size | Width
1908 mm / 75.1 in
2028 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded) | 1892 mm / 74.5 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Rear
1569.0 mm / 61.8 in
Weight
1750.0 kg / 3858.1 lbs
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2752 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
348 g/km
Fuel Economy
14.5 L/100km / 16.2 MPG (combined) | 20.9 L/100km / 11.3 MPG (urban) | 10.8 L/100km / 21.8 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine
M 155.980
AJ133
Engine | Bore
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
Engine | Displacement
5.4 L / 331.9 cu-in / 5439.0 cc
5.0 L / 305.1 cu-in / 5000.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 SOHC engine with 3 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic AMG SPEEDSHIFT R
Automatic

Production

Availability
2011 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
89%
93%
Pros
  • Great performance and handling
  • Overall good design
  • Exceptionally stout drivetrain
  • Superb supercharged engines
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Comfortable yet sporty
  • Better-looking than the coupe
Cons
  • Worse performance than the coupe
  • Worse styling than the coupe
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.