Compare Chevrolet Corvette C7 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible
Variants
Grand Sport
Grand Sport AT
Stingray
Stingray AT
Z06
Z06 AT
ZR1
ZR1 AT
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Wheelbase
2811 mm / 110.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6 b
Engine | Bore
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
96%
80%
Pros
- Superb performance
- Much improved handling
- Great chassis and suspension
- High drivetrain reliability
- Unique 7-speed manual transmission
- Decent performance
- Affordable way to get a big V8
- Sounds great
Cons
- The Targa may be more interesting
- Build quality concerns
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.