Compare Alpina Roadster S vs Mini R52 Convertible
Variants
Cooper
Cooper S
One
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
240 L / 8.5 cu-ft ~ 260 L / 9.2 cu-ft
120 L / 4.2 cu-ft ~ 605 L / 21.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs
325 kg / 717 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19, 265/30 R19
175/65 R15
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1300 mm / 51.2 in
1415 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
4090 mm / 161.0 in
3635 mm / 143.1 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
1688 mm / 66.5 in
Track Width | Front
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1458.0 mm / 57.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
Weight
1320.0 kg / 2910.1 lbs
Wheel Size
8.5J-9.5J X 19
5.5J x 15
Wheelbase
2500 mm / 98.4 in
2467 mm / 97.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
5.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.0 sec
Fuel Economy
15.0 L/100km / 15.7 MPG (urban) | 7.0 L/100km / 33.6 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
265.0 km/h / 164.7 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
77.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.2:1
Engine | Displacement
3.3 L / 204.2 cu-in / 3346.0 cc
1.6 L / 97.5 cu-in / 1598.0 cc
Engine | Power
300.0 hp / 223.7 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
89.7 hp/L / 1.5 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.8 mm / 3.7 in
85.8 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
362 Nm / 267.0 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Manual
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
87%
28%
Pros
- Gorgeous styling
- Manual transmission
- Good performance
- Small turning circle
- Easy to drive and park
- Affordable fun
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- Slow and sluggish
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Some reliability concerns
- Less elegant than the Hatch
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.