Compare Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Ford Thunderbird 11
Variants
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
2001
2002+
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1394 mm / 54.9 in
1323 mm / 52.1 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2723 mm / 107.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 241.0 cu-in / 3950.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
66%
Pros
- Improved styling
- Better build quality
- Fully independent suspensions
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Good suspension setup
Cons
- Tiny inline-4 engine
- Somewhat strange looking
- Does not handle well
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.