Compare Ford Mustang 5 Convertible vs Volvo C70 II
Variants
Mustang
Mustang GT 304
Mustang GT 324
Mustang GT 324 AT
Mustang GT 500 507
Mustang GT 500 558
Mustang GT 500 672
2.0D
2.0D AT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
2.4D
D5
D5 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5 230 AT
T5 220
T5 220 AT
T5 230
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
275 L / 9.7 cu-ft
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Width
1877 mm / 73.9 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Reviews
Neofiliac score
73%
29%
Pros
- Great V8 choices
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Improved sporty styling
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Cheap on the used market
Cons
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Basic suspension setup
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Diesel in a convertible
- Complicated top mechanism
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.