Compare Mercedes C-Class Coupe C204 vs Mercedes C-Class Coupe C205 facelift
Variants
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY AT
C 200
C 200 AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 250 AT
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI AT
C 350 AT
C 63 AMG
C 63 AMG Black Series
C 63 AMG Edition 507
C 63 AMG Performance
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.6 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1406 mm / 55.4 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2760 mm / 108.7 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
75%
70%
Pros
- Several versions of the NA C63 AMG
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Rather robust drivetrain
- Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Lower grade of build than the CLK
- AWD nonsense
- Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
- Less durable engines
- Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.