Compare Ford GT vs Jaguar XK X150
Variants
558 PS
4.2
5.0
XKR 4.2
XKR 5.0
XKR-S
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
46 L / 1.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-Wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-Wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
235/45 ZR18, 315/40 ZR19
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1125 mm / 44.3 in
Size | Length
4645 mm / 182.9 in
Size | Width
1955 mm / 77.0 in
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1620.0 mm / 63.8 in
Wheel Size
9J z 18, 11.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2710 mm / 106.7 in
2752 mm / 108.3 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
90.2 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.4:1
Engine | Displacement
5.4 L / 330.1 cu-in / 5409.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
105.8 mm / 4.2 in
Engine | Type
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
78%
82%
Pros
- Great retro styling
- Good drivetrain
- Supercharged V8 power
- Improved reliability
- Good suspension setup
Cons
- Very little cargo space
- Rather uncomfortable
- Mediocre performance
- Lower grade of build
- Less beautiful
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.