Compare Toyota Harrier 3 vs Toyota Harrier 4
Variants
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R19
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Dimensions
Size | Height
1690 mm / 66.5 in
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4740 mm / 186.6 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in
1855 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
19 in
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Powertrain
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
29%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good build quality
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Small engines
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.