Compare Toyota Harrier 3 vs Lexus RX 4 facelift
Variants
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
RX 350
RX 350 AWD
RX 350L AWD
RX 350L
RX 450h AWD
Capacity
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 328 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs, 338 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
16.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
24.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
235/65 R18
Dimensions
Size | Height
1690 mm / 66.5 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in
1895 mm / 74.6 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
8J x 18
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Powertrain
Emission Standard
ULEV 70
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Redline
6300 rpm
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
8-speed
Production
Availability
2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
72%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good build quality
- Superb reliability
- Good refinement
- Some offroad capabilities
Cons
- Small engines
- Slow and sluggish
- Poor performance
- Image problem
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.