Compare Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score28%42%
Pros
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.