Compare Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class X204

Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift

Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class X204

Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 faceliftMercedes-Benz GLK-Class X204
Variants
GLA 180
GLA 180 DCT
GLA 180d
GLA 180d DCT
GLA 200
GLA 200 DCT
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 200d DCT
GLA 220 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220 DCT
GLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220d DCT
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC DCT
GLA 250 DCT
GLA 45 AMG 4MATIC DCT
GLK 200
GLK 200 CDI
GLK 200 CDI AT
GLK 220 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 220 CDI
GLK 220 CDI AT
GLK 250 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 250 4MATIC AT
GLK 280 4MATIC AT
GLK 320 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI Euro5 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 4MATIC AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score36%45%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Falsely sold as SUV
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lethargic drivetrain

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.