Compare Skoda Kodiaq vs Mazda CX-7
Variants
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 150 4x4
1.4 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 4x4 DSG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 150 4x4
2.0 TDI 150 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 177 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 4x4 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 180 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4x4 DSG
GT 186 AT
GT 220 4x4 DSG
RS 4x4 DSG
2.2D
2.3 Turbo AWD AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo
2.3 DiSi Turbo AT
2.3 DiSi Turbo AWD AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
69.0 L / 18.2 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1645 mm / 64.8 in
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
Powertrain
Engine | Stroke
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
36%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Small turning circle
- Good fuel efficiency
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.