Compare Ford Mustang 6 vs Renault Laguna Coupe
Variants
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 V6 304
3.7 V6 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
2.0 Turbo 170 AT
2.0 Turbo 205
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 178
3.0 dCi AT
3.5 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
423 L / 14.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Hatchback
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Length
4643 mm / 182.8 in
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1548.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
84%
24%
Pros
- Superb V8 engine (sound, character, and reliability)
- Sweet 6-speed manual
- Front engine, RWD
- Classic, imposing styling
- Great value
- Easy to work on
- Very durable
- Decent engine reliability
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not the best fit and finish
- No independent rear suspensions
- Awkward styling
- Poor build quality
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.