Compare Renault Megane II vs Renault Clio V
Variants
1.4 82
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 101
1.5 dCi 101 AT
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 82
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 113
1.6 113 AT
1.9 dCi 120
1.9 dCi 90
2.0 135
2.0 135 AT
2.0 Turbo 163
GT 1.9 dCi 110
GT 1.9 dCi 130
GT 1.9 dCi 130 AT
GT 2.0 dCi 150
RS 2.0 dCi 173
RS 2.0 Turbo 224
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Wheelbase
2583 mm / 101.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
19%
Pros
- Interesting engine options
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.